U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission vs Wikipedia (English) — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission outscores Wikipedia (English) on Citation Discipline by 2 points (A+ · 98 vs A+ · 96).
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Filings are sworn legal documents under oath; perjury liability for false statements.
Wikipedia (English)
Inline citations required by editorial policy on every factual claim; uncited claims tagged within hours.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Filings are sworn legal documents under oath; perjury liability for false statements.
Inline citations required by editorial policy on every factual claim; uncited claims tagged within hours.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Legal weightFilers personally liable for material misstatements.
- WP:V (Verifiability)Core policy mandates reliable sources.
- Citation needed tagActive triage process surfaces gaps publicly.
Other dimensions for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission vs Wikipedia (English)
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (sec.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Wikipedia (English) (en.wikipedia.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/sec-gov-vs-wikipedia-en/discipline.json