DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission vs Wikipedia (English) — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission outscores Wikipedia (English) on Citation Discipline by 2 points (A+ · 98 vs A+ · 96).
Higher Discipline
Government
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
sec.gov
A+·98
Rank #1 of 130 on Discipline
Filings are sworn legal documents under oath; perjury liability for false statements.
Reference
Wikipedia (English)
en.wikipedia.org
A+·96
Rank #2 of 130 on Discipline
Inline citations required by editorial policy on every factual claim; uncited claims tagged within hours.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionA+·98
Discipline · 98/100
Filings are sworn legal documents under oath; perjury liability for false statements.
Wikipedia (English)A+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Inline citations required by editorial policy on every factual claim; uncited claims tagged within hours.
Signals behind the Discipline score
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Legal weightFilers personally liable for material misstatements.
Wikipedia (English)
- WP:V (Verifiability)Core policy mandates reliable sources.
- Citation needed tagActive triage process surfaces gaps publicly.
Other dimensions for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission vs Wikipedia (English)
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR