DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy vs Wikipedia (English) — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Wikipedia (English) tie on Citation Discipline (A+ · 96).
Reference
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
plato.stanford.edu
A+·96
Rank #12 of 130 on Discipline
Every entry peer-reviewed by domain experts; updates tracked via versioning; bibliography per entry.
Reference
Wikipedia (English)
en.wikipedia.org
A+·96
Rank #2 of 130 on Discipline
Inline citations required by editorial policy on every factual claim; uncited claims tagged within hours.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyA+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Every entry peer-reviewed by domain experts; updates tracked via versioning; bibliography per entry.
Wikipedia (English)A+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Inline citations required by editorial policy on every factual claim; uncited claims tagged within hours.
Signals behind the Discipline score
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Entry-level peer reviewEach article reviewed by editors + domain experts; updates versioned.
Wikipedia (English)
- WP:V (Verifiability)Core policy mandates reliable sources.
- Citation needed tagActive triage process surfaces gaps publicly.
Other dimensions for Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy vs Wikipedia (English)
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR