DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
Association for Computing Machinery vs arXiv — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
Association for Computing Machinery outscores arXiv on Citation Discipline by 18 points (A+ · 96 vs B · 78).
Higher Discipline
Academic
Association for Computing Machinery
dl.acm.org
A+·96
Rank #8 of 130 on Discipline
Peer-review across ACM journals + conferences (SIGGRAPH, CHI, etc.); methodology rigorous.
Academic
arXiv
arxiv.org
B·78
Rank #108 of 130 on Discipline
Moderation-only filter (not peer-review). Endorsement system catches obvious quality issues; substantive review is downstream.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Association for Computing MachineryA+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Peer-review across ACM journals + conferences (SIGGRAPH, CHI, etc.); methodology rigorous.
arXivB·78
Discipline · 78/100
Moderation-only filter (not peer-review). Endorsement system catches obvious quality issues; substantive review is downstream.
Signals behind the Discipline score
Association for Computing Machinery
- ACM peer reviewStandardized academic peer-review process.
arXiv
- Endorsement systemNew submitters need an endorsement from an established author.
- Pre-peer-reviewPapers may be revised, retracted, or never published in journals.
Other dimensions for Association for Computing Machinery vs arXiv
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR