arXiv vs Hugging Face — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Hugging Face outscores arXiv on Citation Discipline by 2 points (B · 80 vs B · 78).
arXiv
Moderation-only filter (not peer-review). Endorsement system catches obvious quality issues; substantive review is downstream.
Hugging Face
Model + dataset cards + licenses + per-model methodology; community quality varies.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Moderation-only filter (not peer-review). Endorsement system catches obvious quality issues; substantive review is downstream.
Model + dataset cards + licenses + per-model methodology; community quality varies.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Endorsement systemNew submitters need an endorsement from an established author.
- Pre-peer-reviewPapers may be revised, retracted, or never published in journals.
- Model cardsStandardized model documentation requirement.
Other dimensions for arXiv vs Hugging Face
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — arXiv (arxiv.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Hugging Face (huggingface.co) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/arxiv-vs-huggingface/discipline.json