DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
The Guardian vs The Times (UK) — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
The Guardian outscores The Times (UK) on Citation Discipline by 3 points (A · 85 vs B · 82).
Higher Discipline
News
The Guardian
theguardian.com
A·85
Rank #88 of 130 on Discipline
Editorial code public; corrections column; multi-source standard; Scott Trust ownership shields independence.
News
The Times (UK)
thetimes.co.uk
B·82
Rank #96 of 130 on Discipline
Long fact-check tradition; named bylines; corrections public; some opinion-news drift noted.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
The GuardianA·85
Discipline · 85/100
Editorial code public; corrections column; multi-source standard; Scott Trust ownership shields independence.
The Times (UK)B·82
Discipline · 82/100
Long fact-check tradition; named bylines; corrections public; some opinion-news drift noted.
Signals behind the Discipline score
The Guardian
- Scott TrustOwnership structure shields editorial from commercial pressure.
The Times (UK)
- Editorial standardsIPSO-regulated; long history of corrections discipline.
Other dimensions for The Guardian vs The Times (UK)
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR