SourceScore
DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite

National Geographic vs Smithsonian Magazine — Discipline

How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.

Verdict

National Geographic outscores Smithsonian Magazine on Citation Discipline by 2 points (B · 82 vs B · 80).

Higher Discipline
Magazine

National Geographic

nationalgeographic.com
B·82
Rank #98 of 130 on Discipline

Long fact-checking tradition; named bylines; sources cited; institutional editorial standards.

Magazine

Smithsonian Magazine

smithsonianmag.com
B·80
Rank #107 of 130 on Discipline

Fact-checked editorial; named bylines; sources cited inline; Smithsonian institutional standards.

Global rank · Discipline

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
National Geographic
nationalgeographic.com
82B·82#98 / 130view →
Smithsonian Magazine
smithsonianmag.com
80B·80#107 / 130view →

Why these Discipline scores

National GeographicB·82
Discipline · 82/100

Long fact-checking tradition; named bylines; sources cited; institutional editorial standards.

Smithsonian MagazineB·80
Discipline · 80/100

Fact-checked editorial; named bylines; sources cited inline; Smithsonian institutional standards.

Signals behind the Discipline score

National Geographic
  • Editorial standards
    138-year fact-check tradition; National Geographic Society heritage.
Smithsonian Magazine
  • Smithsonian standards
    Editorial reviewed against institutional historical + scientific accuracy standards.

Other dimensions for National Geographic vs Smithsonian Magazine

Other Discipline comparisons

Sources & references

Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.