News sources ranked by Citation Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
ProPublica leads news on Citation Discipline — A+ · 95 · 27 sources scored
News ranked by Discipline
- #1A+·95ProPublicapropublica.org
Methodology + raw data published alongside most stories; fact-checked; corrections public.
- #2A·91Reutersreuters.com
Two-source verification policy enforced editorially; corrections logged with timestamps.
- #3A·89Associated Pressapnews.com
Multi-source verification; AP Stylebook defines US journalism citation conventions.
- #4A·88The New York Timesnytimes.com
Multi-source verification; fact-check + corrections processes public; named bylines + editor accountability.
- #5A·88The Wall Street Journalwsj.com
Multi-source verification; corrections public; named bylines + editor accountability; fact-check process documented.
- #6A·88Financial Timesft.com
Editorial Code public; multi-source verification; corrections discipline.
- #7A·88The Conversationtheconversation.com
Articles authored by academics with credentials disclosed + edited by professional journalists; corrections public.
- #8A·87The Washington Postwashingtonpost.com
Multi-source verification; corrections public; named bylines + standards editor accountability.
- #9A·86Bloomberg Newsbloomberg.com
The Way We Work editorial guide enforces fact-check + sourcing standards; corrections public.
- #10A·86Semaforsemafor.com
Semaform separates reporting + reporter-view + alternative-views; corrections + sourcing transparent.
- #11A·85The Guardiantheguardian.com
Editorial code public; corrections column; multi-source standard; Scott Trust ownership shields independence.
- #12A·85Der Spiegelspiegel.de
Famed multi-stage Dokumentation (fact-checking) department; corrections public; named bylines.
- #13B·84NPRnpr.org
Public ethics handbook; ombudsman role for accountability; corrections public.
- #14B·84Le Mondelemonde.fr
Independent ownership (Le Monde Group), strong fact-check tradition, public corrections, named bylines.
- #15B·82Axios Proaxios.com/pro
Specialist editors + sourcing rigor; corrections public.
- #16B·82The Times (UK)thetimes.co.uk
Long fact-check tradition; named bylines; corrections public; some opinion-news drift noted.
- #17B·82The Globe and Mailtheglobeandmail.com
Strong editorial standards, named bylines, public corrections, fact-check process.
- #18B·80BBC Newsbbc.com
Editorial Guidelines mandate dual-source verification; corrections page public.
- #19B·80Politicopolitico.com
Multi-source political reporting; corrections public; named-author bylines + editor accountability.
- #20B·80Axiosaxios.com
Multi-source reporting + named bylines + corrections public; brevity format is structural not editorial choice.
- #21B·80El Paíselpais.com
Strong fact-check tradition, named bylines, public corrections, in-house Defensor del Lector ombuds.
- #22B·80Asahi Shimbunasahi.com
Long editorial tradition; named bylines; corrections public; fact-check department.
- #23B·78Al Jazeera Englishaljazeera.com
Editorial code public; multi-source verification standard; corrections process exists.
- #24B·78South China Morning Postscmp.com
Strong editorial standards historically; ownership-influence concerns raised post-2016 Alibaba acquisition.
- #25B·71The Economisteconomist.com
Editorial fact-check process is rigorous, but anonymity makes individual-claim provenance opaque.
- #26D·50HuffPosthuffpost.com
Staff articles strong; legacy contributor blogs (now archived) varying quality; corrections public.
- #27D·50Fox Newsfoxnews.com
Hard-news desk runs editorial standards; opinion + commentary pieces often single-sourced; corrections varying.